Yahoo reinforces its utter lack of ideas and/or strategy by threatening to launch a patent suit against Facebook: ow.ly/1HfqQg
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Yahoo Stabs Facebook In The Back, Says Pay For Its Patents Or Get Sued

After years of positive relations, friendly blog posts, and  referral traffic, Yahoo may have just been biding its time waiting to  declare war on Facebook. Today it suddenly accused its former ally of  infringing on 10-20 of its patents. It demands a settlement from  Facebook or it says it will sue. The betrayer only warned Facebook  privately once the New York Times had publicly published  details passed to it by Yahoo. Though dastardly opportunistic, this  patent trolling could produce a big windfall for Yahoo’s investors.
Facebook tells me it was blindsided, saying “Yahoo contacted us at  the same time they called the New York Times, so we haven’t had the  opportunity to fully evaluate their claims.” Facebook has been very  conservative about its use of patents. It bought some especially far-reaching social networking patents  originally owned by Friendster from Malaysian company MOL for $40  million in 2010, but never used them offsensively even when it felt  threatened by Twitter.
Yahoo has long worked closely with Facebook, using the social network  to power sign-up and login of its email service and Flickr. Just 11  days ago, Facebook congratulated Yahoo in a blog post  noting its Open Graph protocol had helped Yahoo’s news reader app gain  25 million users, including 2 million each day, and more than 500,000  referrals a day. I doubt we’ll see such courtesies between these two  anytime soon.
Today’s attack comes at a particularly vulnerable time for Facebook,  during the quiet period leading up to its IPO. Facebook could be forced  to license the patents or settle with Yahoo by paying out pre-IPO stock,  the same way Google was coerced into giving Yahoo 2.7 million shares in  a patent settlement before the search giant’s 2004 IPO.
Details are sketchy on which of Yahoo’s patents it believes Facebook has infringed upon. However, Forbes reported  in November that Yahoo held 1,100 US patents with 2,661 pending, and it  could have 3-4x that many international patents. These include patents  on paid search that Facebook may be violating through its deal with  Microsoft Bing, and basic social networking patents that could apply to  core parts of Facebook’s business.
Yahoo has held these patents defensively for years as a deterrent to  trolling by other patent holders. But Facebook is a young company  without a robust portfolio, and with record buzz about its IPO, now  might be the perfect time to shake down the social network. A Yahoo  crony tells the NYT that the two companies met today, and now it says  “We must insist that Facebook either enter into a licensing agreement or  we will be compelled to move forward unilaterally to protect our  rights.”
Honestly, this is despicable. After relentlessly stagnating as  Facebook innovated, to now try to extort Zuckerberg’s company just as it  enters the spotlight reeks of desperation. The only positive news from  Yahoo in recent memory was thanks to the viral nature of Facebook’s  social graph that Yahoo may says it owns the rights to. Did the  Winklevii join Yahoo’s board?
GigaOm’s Mathew Ingram puts it eloquently:
Perhaps Yahoo sees Facebook as too big of a threat  to its ailing display ad business. Even if it does score cash or stock  in a settlement, Yahoo’s shareholders should be worried. Your business  model shouldn’t depend on the remarkable shortsightedness of a patent  officer who thought it was ok to let someone own the concept of  connections between personal profiles online.














0 comments:
Post a Comment